Gourd allowed to grow unencumbered. |
Mimeographing practice handouts. |
Practicing with a SmartBoard. |
Mobil technology combines 'doing' with learning, making it more dynamic and immediate reflecting how information is accessed outside of school. Whether information and learning accessed at school is shallow (lower order thinking -- drilling facts) or deep (or higher order thinking -- critical evaluations) depends on the education goal and use of the technology. The thinking skills accessed make a difference when learning: repetition and critical evaluation is vital, but not exclusively one or the other. Gifted students generally get a concept in one, maybe two, repetitions. Anything over that is counterproductive. Mobil technology can empower students in new and expansive ways by sidestepping the drill overkill. However, if questions don't inspire thinking, why bother? Will technology be used as the teacher or the tool?
Online public schools such as Carpe Diem Schools offer middle and high school education as an online experience on a main campus, or through the Student Support Centers. For gifted thinkers, this allows individual pacing. Since there would not be a 'classroom of students', individuals would not be held back so everyone can catch up. On the other hand, images of classrooms at these schools show students working individually...hardly indicative of personal, collaborative learning but more solitary in nature.
At St. Mary's in Ohio, students use Smartphones to use programs to sketch, write daily learning blurbs, investigate quick answers, and access flashcards. Small, portable, and easy to use, Smartphones technology is fast, efficient, and accessible as a tool in addition to the hands-on paper and pencil activities. Students engage in immediate answers, can work together in groups, and keep technology with them as they move through the day. But what if someone needs a little more drill? At what point does student learning get assessed so he/she can be stopped, backed up, and given a little extra practice?
In both scenarios, drill-and-practice or inquiry, there is the potential for classroom distraction since the very reasons that make computers helpful and SmartPhones efficient and portable can also provide opportunities for activities apart from educational purposes. Trust and responsibility must become part of education.
I feel prepared to engage in teaching with technology. I never used the SmartBoards much because of the 'toy-factor' -- even my students said they were nothing more than fancy white boards. Currently, I use Word extensively, online search engines and databases strategies, and assisting students with moving at a personal pace. We use the oldest laptops in the school system--ones that do not hold a charge anymore so there are cords wrapping around the tables and across the floor, keyboards with missing letters, two have duct tape holding the guts in the body. Word is currently expiring on the laptops, and being replaced with Apache Office Works. Yet, we move forward!
The students use the Index Card System for making notes--coding source cards to match the note cards. They learn how to write a survey: introduction, question organization, type of questions, differences between types of responses, and placement of demographics. They tabulate the results and prepare charts and graphs illustrating the results. The process takes about 3 weeks....using Google Forms would cut that time down to days and allow for additional surveys or further research!
The students currently keep a daily journal that keeps their reflections, daily summaries, and
key information about their topics. The binder is kept at school, or sometimes taken home depending on what is due or when extra time needs to be given to the project. Blogger could replace the journal, especially when combined with other tools and links. DropBox would allow written work to be accessed from anywhere!
An combination of what I've been doing and updated technology could turn a research class into a higher level thinking course that is in keeping with what happens in the world...certainly what is happening in the students' world. Using Google products would be an exciting avenue of learning and, for me, teaching. So, to that end, this is what I've done:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjA9NXeBNEhKPqL7JSqJcq_ZZ-DKSSsXxUQS-jjG9jvErrW0FiO-0fXGePJ_tWh_wa2dxJbQEFw1YHRvnDVcqFReGSHfv-eqEOJccUGQu6dWjbNT0KBjjvevD3s2j2CK969tARF3vnonx0/s1600/thumbnail.jpg)
At the end of the semester, I'd assess the level of success with a survey. Of the 17 students, 8 have taken PRISMS twice before so not only will I get data from middle school students who have never had an online course before, I will get information from students who can make clear comparisons between the online and not-online class strengths and weaknesses.
Hell yeah. Very nice work.
ReplyDeleteSorry I got excited reading the post. I would love to work on the project with you if I could be of any assistance in the design or evaluation of your project.
ReplyDeleteDon't think I won't be visiting you! Right now the project has advanced to FCPS IT department who are reviewing county online restrictions to see what they'd have to do to loosen the strings a bit. I'm hopeful for the ChromeBook grant because, as it turns out, FCPS IT has been itching to get a demonstration of them and this could be what makes it comes. It'll be interesting to see what comes...gifted education is a love/hate concept at times, but being able to promote this
ReplyDeleteas a long-range benefit for all students is what I'm shooting for!